📖WEB · 1 Chronicles 26:10
What does 1 Chronicles 26:10 mean?
"Also Hosah, of the children of Merari, had sons: Shimri the chief (for though he was not the firstborn, yet his father made him chief),"
— 1 Chronicles 26:10 (World English Bible)
Surrounding context
The sons of Shemaiah: Othni, Rephael, Obed, and Elzabad, whose brothers were valiant men, Elihu, and Semachiah.
All these were of the sons of Obed-Edom: they and their sons and their brothers, able men in strength for the service; sixty-two of Obed-Edom.
Meshelemiah had sons and brothers, valiant men, eighteen.
Also Hosah, of the children of Merari, had sons: Shimri the chief (for though he was not the firstborn, yet his father made him chief),
Hilkiah the second, Tebaliah the third, and Zechariah the fourth: all the sons and brothers of Hosah were thirteen.
Of these were the divisions of the doorkeepers, even of the chief men, having offices like their brothers, to minister in Yahweh’s house.
They cast lots, the small as well as the great, according to their fathers’ houses, for every gate.
Explanation
1 Chronicles 26:10 comes from a lengthy genealogical and organizational section in the book, where the Chronicler is listing the divisions of the Levites who served as gatekeepers in the house of the Lord. This particular verse identifies Hosah, a descendant of Merari (one of the three sons of Levi, alongside Gershon and Kohath), and names his sons, with special attention to Shimri, who was appointed as chief among his brothers even though he was not the firstborn.
The verse simply states that Hosah had several sons, and that his father designated Shimri as the leader of that family group for gatekeeping duties, despite the fact that another son held the natural right of the firstborn. The text explicitly notes this exception—"though he was not the firstborn, yet his father made him chief"—which signals to the reader that this was a deliberate and notable decision, not an oversight or mistake in the record.
Historically, 1 Chronicles was written after the Babylonian exile, likely by a priestly or Levitical author, to help the returning Jewish community reconnect with their identity, worship practices, and the structure of temple service that had existed before the exile. Genealogies like this one were not merely historical records; they served a practical purpose, reestablishing who belonged to which family, what roles they were entitled to perform, and how the sacred work of temple maintenance and security was organized among the Levitical clans. The gatekeepers held an important and trusted role, guarding the entrances to God's house and overseeing various treasuries and storerooms.
Theologically, this verse quiet
Compare translations
Go deeper with ScriptureCompanion AI
Ask questions about any verse, follow reading plans, write personal prayers, and track your daily habit — all grounded in verified scripture text.