🔢WEB · Numbers 26:33

What does Numbers 26:33 mean?

"Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah."

— Numbers 26:33 (World English Bible)

Surrounding context

30

These are the sons of Gilead: of Iezer, the family of the Iezerites; of Helek, the family of the Helekites;

31

and Asriel, the family of the Asrielites; and Shechem, the family of the Shechemites;

32

and Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites; and Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.

33

Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

34

These are the families of Manasseh. Those who were counted of them were fifty-two thousand seven hundred.

35

These are the sons of Ephraim after their families: of Shuthelah, the family of the Shuthelahites; of Becher, the family of the Becherites; of Tahan, the family of the Tahanites.

36

These are the sons of Shuthelah: of Eran, the family of the Eranites.

Explanation

Numbers 26:33 records a simple genealogical fact within the larger census of Israel taken on the plains of Moab, just before the people entered the Promised Land: a man named Zelophehad, from the tribe of Manasseh, died leaving no sons, only five daughters, whose names are given as Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. On its surface this is a plain statement of family record, the kind of detail that fills census lists throughout Numbers 26. But the naming of these daughters is deliberate and significant, and the verse is best understood as a narrative seed that grows into a much larger story later in the book.

The context is the second great census of Israel, taken under Moses near the end of the wilderness generation, in preparation for the conquest and distribution of the land of Canaan among the tribes. Land was to be allotted according to family lines, traced through the sons of each tribe. Zelophehad's situation—no male heir—posed a real problem under this system, since without a son his family line would seemingly disappear from the inheritance rolls. By naming his daughters specifically here, the text is preparing the reader for what happens in Numbers 27, where these same five women approach Moses and boldly petition that they be allowed to inherit their father's portion of land in place of a son. Moses brings their case to God, who rules in their favor and establishes a new legal precedent: when a man dies without sons, his inheritance passes to his daughters (Numbers 27:1-11). This ruling is later revisited in Numbers 36, where further stipulations are added reg

Compare translations

Go deeper with ScriptureCompanion AI

Ask questions about any verse, follow reading plans, write personal prayers, and track your daily habit — all grounded in verified scripture text.